You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive assessment of HF-rTMS treatment mechanism for post-stroke dysphagia in rats by integration of fecal metabolomics and 16S rRNA sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1373737 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fei Zhao, Jiemei Chen, Yilong Shan, Jiena Hong, Qiuping Ye, Yong Dai, Jiahui Hu, Jiantao Zhang, Chao Li, Hongmei Wen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#23,073,166
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6,423
of 8,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,743
of 152,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#89
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.