You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-term outcomes of survivors with influenza A H1N1 virus-induced severe pneumonia and ARDS: a single-center prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1378379 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiao Tang, Xiao-Li Xu, Na Wan, Yu Zhao, Rui Wang, Xu-Yan Li, Ying Li, Li Wang, Hai-Chao Li, Yue Gu, Chun-Yan Zhang, Qi Yang, Zhao-Hui Tong, Bing Sun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,960,645
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#3,712
of 8,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,998
of 209,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#58
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.