You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gut microbiota composition in travellers is associated with faecal lipocalin-2, a mediator of gut inflammation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1387126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Javier Gandasegui, Andrea Vergara, Pedro Fleitas, Elisa Rubio, Mariana Fernandez-Pittol, Cristian Aylagas, Míriam Alvarez, Noelia Zancada, Daniel Camprubí-Ferrer, Jordi Vila, José Muñoz, Paula Petrone, Climent Casals-Pascual |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,060,468
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,439
of 8,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,874
of 163,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#16
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.