You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Toward Data Sense-Making in Digital Health Communication Research: Why Theory Matters in the Age of Big Data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Communication, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00011 |
Authors |
Edmund W. J. Lee, Andrew Z. H. Yee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
United States | 2 | 20% |
Denmark | 1 | 10% |
Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
Singapore | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
Lecturer | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 24% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 12 | 27% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
Design | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,914,509
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Communication
#265
of 1,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,515
of 385,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Communication
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.