You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Living With Elephants: Evidence-Based Planning to Conserve Wild Elephants in a Megadiverse South East Asian Country
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2021.682590 |
| Authors |
Ee Phin Wong, Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz, Natasha Zulaikha, Praveena Chackrapani, Aida Ghani Quilter, J. Antonio de la Torre, Alicia Solana-Mena, Wei Harn Tan, Lisa Ong, Muhammad Amin Rusli, Sinchita Sinha, Vanitha Ponnusamy, Teck Wyn Lim, Oi Ching Or, Ahmad Fitri Aziz, Ning Hii, Ange Seok Ling Tan, Jamie Wadey, Vivienne P. W. Loke, Abdullah Zawawi, Muhammad Munir Idris, Pazil Abdul Patah, Mohd Taufik Abdul Rahman, Salman Saaban |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 25% |
| Philippines | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 18% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,062,102
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#200
of 298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,786
of 436,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#25
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.