You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fostering Coexistence Between People and Large Carnivores in Africa: Using a Theory of Change to Identify Pathways to Impact and Their Underlying Assumptions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2021.698631 |
| Authors |
Sarah M. Durant, Agnese Marino, John D. C. Linnell, Alayne Oriol-Cotterill, Stephanie Dloniak, Stephanie Dolrenry, Paul Funston, Rosemary J. Groom, Lise Hanssen, Jane Horgan, Dennis Ikanda, Audrey Ipavec, Bernard Kissui, Laly Lichtenfeld, J. Weldon McNutt, Nicholas Mitchell, Elizabeth Naro, Abdoulkarim Samna, Gidey Yirga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 20% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Norway | 2 | 5% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 5% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Botswana | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 75% |
| Scientists | 10 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 42 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,543,430
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#62
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,150
of 521,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.