You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing African Vultures as Biomonitors and Umbrella Species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2021.729025 |
| Authors |
Lindy J. Thompson, Sonja C. Krüger, Brent M. Coverdale, L. Jen Shaffer, Mary Ann Ottinger, John P. Davies, Clément Daboné, Micheal Kibuule, S. Imad Cherkaoui, Rebecca A. Garbett, W. Louis Phipps, Evan R. Buechley, Alfonso Godino Ruiz, Miguel Lecoq, Camilo Carneiro, Reginal M. Harrell, Meredith L. Gore, William W. Bowerman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 31% |
| South Africa | 3 | 19% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,805,564
of 24,834,604 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#64
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,920
of 514,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#16
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,834,604 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.