You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines to Facilitate Human-Wildlife Interactions in Conservation Translocations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.788520 |
| Authors |
Adriana Consorte-McCrea, Shekhar Kolipaka, Jacob R. Owens, Carlos R. Ruiz-Miranda, Siân Waters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 17% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#13,402,540
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#185
of 293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,536
of 549,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#31
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 549,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.