You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Continental Assessment of the Drivers of Tropical Deforestation With a Focus on Protected Areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.830248 |
| Authors |
Steffen Fritz, Juan Carlos Laso Bayas, Linda See, Dmitry Schepaschenko, Florian Hofhansl, Martin Jung, Martina Dürauer, Ivelina Georgieva, Olga Danylo, Myroslava Lesiv, Ian McCallum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 18% |
| Austria | 1 | 9% |
| Colombia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,668,396
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#66
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,560
of 453,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#9
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.