You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Addressing the Swedish Large Carnivore Controversy: Identifying Roadblocks in Collaborative Governance to Reduce Conflict
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.952242 |
| Authors |
Juliana Bennett, Annelie Sjölander-Lindqvist, Camilla Sandström, Simon Larsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Guatemala | 1 | 10% |
| Portugal | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Energy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,734,189
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#170
of 382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,628
of 424,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.