↓ Skip to main content

Models for linking hunter retention and recruitment to regulations and game populations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Models for linking hunter retention and recruitment to regulations and game populations
Published in
Frontiers in Conservation Science, September 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcosc.2023.1265806
Authors

C. P. McGowan, J. L. Price Tack, A. L. Silvano, J. B. Grand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#19,367,201
of 24,664,952 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#291
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,798
of 263,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,664,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.