↓ Skip to main content

Assisted colonization of albatrosses in the California Channel Islands: conservation basis and suitability assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assisted colonization of albatrosses in the California Channel Islands: conservation basis and suitability assessment
Published in
Frontiers in Conservation Science, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcosc.2023.1279373
Authors

Eric A. VanderWerf, Nick D. Holmes, Scott A. Morrison, C. Robby Kohley, Alex Wegmann, Lindsay C. Young

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#19,892,857
of 25,318,210 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#326
of 398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,394
of 155,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,318,210 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.