You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does scale or method matter for conservation? Application of directional and omnidirectional connectivity models in spatial prioritizations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2023.976914 |
| Authors |
Jeremy S. Dertien, Robert F. Baldwin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 6 | 55% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,870,020
of 23,575,882 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#248
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,724
of 396,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#18
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.