You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for the governance of biodiversity conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2023.989019 |
| Authors |
Eduardo Gallo-Cajiao, Nives Dolšak, Aseem Prakash, Taej Mundkur, Paul G. Harris, Ronald B. Mitchell, Nick Davidson, Birgita Hansen, Bradley K. Woodworth, Richard A. Fuller, Melissa Price, Nicky Petkov, Volker Mauerhofer, Tiffany H. Morrison, James E. M. Watson, Sayam U. Chowdhury, Christoph Zöckler, Oscar Widerberg, Ding Li Yong, Daniel Klich, Vitaliy Smagol, John Piccolo, Duan Biggs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 2% |
| Belize | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 73% |
| Scientists | 8 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Librarian | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#206,155
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#12
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,599
of 502,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.