↓ Skip to main content

Increasing availability of reference mitochondrial genomes for imperiled fishes in western North America for environmental DNA assay design and species monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increasing availability of reference mitochondrial genomes for imperiled fishes in western North America for environmental DNA assay design and species monitoring
Published in
Frontiers in Conservation Science, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcosc.2024.1294358
Authors

Tracy A. Diver, Steven M. Mussmann, Melody J. Saltzgiver, Alexis S. Harrison, Wade D. Wilson, Jason A. Coombs, Aaron P. Maloy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,655,686
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#383
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,047
of 143,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.