↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular Hypertensive Crisis: Recent Evidence and Review of the Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular Hypertensive Crisis: Recent Evidence and Review of the Literature
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2016.00051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christos Varounis, Vasiliki Katsi, Petros Nihoyannopoulos, John Lekakis, Dimitris Tousoulis

Abstract

Despite the high prevalence of hypertension (HTN), only a small proportion of the hypertensive patients will ultimately develop hypertensive crisis. In fact, some patients with hypertensive crisis do not report a history of HTN or previous use of antihypertensive medication. The majority of the patients with hypertensive crisis often report non-specific symptoms, whereas heart-related symptoms (dyspnea, chest pain, arrhythmias, and syncope) are less common. Hypertensive crises can be divided into hypertensive emergencies or hypertensive urgencies according to the presence or absence of acute target organ damage, respectively. This differentiation is an extremely useful classification in clinical practice since a different management is needed, which in turn has a significant effect on the morbidity and mortality of these patients. Therefore, it is very crucial for the physician in the emergency department to identify the hypertensive emergencies and to manage them through blood pressure lowering medications in order to avoid further target organ damage or deterioration. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the recent evidence in an effort to improve the awareness, recognition, risk stratification, and treatment of hypertensive crisis in patients referred to the emergency department.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 385 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 73 19%
Student > Postgraduate 37 10%
Researcher 27 7%
Student > Master 27 7%
Other 26 7%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 152 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 166 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,215,422
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#242
of 6,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,227
of 421,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.