↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Autopsy for Sudden Death in the Young: Is Data Aggregation the Key?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Autopsy for Sudden Death in the Young: Is Data Aggregation the Key?
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2017.00072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Rueda, Jennifer L. Wagner, Tierney C. Phillips, Sarah E. Topol, Evan D. Muse, Jonathan R. Lucas, Glenn N. Wagner, Eric J. Topol, Ali Torkamani

Abstract

The Scripps molecular autopsy study seeks to incorporate genetic testing into the postmortem examination of cases of sudden death in the young (<45 years old). Here, we describe the results from the first 2 years of the study, which consisted of whole exome sequencing (WES) of a cohort of 50 cases predominantly from San Diego County. Apart from the individual description of cases, we analyzed the data at the cohort-level, which brought new perspectives on the genetic causes of sudden death. We investigated the advantages and disadvantages of using WES compared to a gene panel for cardiac disease (usually the first genetic test used by medical examiners). In an attempt to connect complex clinical phenotypes with genotypes, we classified samples by their genetic fingerprint. Finally, we studied the benefits of analyzing the mitochondrial DNA genome. In this regard, we found that half of the cases clinically diagnosed as sudden infant death syndrome had an increased ratio of heteroplasmic variants, and that the variants were also present in the mothers. We believe that community-based data aggregation and sharing will eventually lead to an improved classification of variants. Allele frequencies for the all cases can be accessed via our genomics browser at https://genomics.scripps.edu/browser.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 24%
Other 6 18%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,367,874
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,879
of 6,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,991
of 331,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,928 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.