You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventional Cardio-Oncology: Adding a New Dimension to the Cardio-Oncology Field
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victor Y. Liu, Ali M. Agha, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Nicolas Palaskas, Peter Kim, Kara Thompson, Elie Mouhayar, Konstantinos Marmagkiolis, Saamir A. Hassan, Kaveh Karimzad, Cezar A. Iliescu |
| Abstract |
The management of cardiovascular disease in patients with active cancer presents a unique challenge in interventional cardiology. Cancer patients often suffer from significant comorbidities such as thrombocytopenia and coagulopathic and/or hypercoagulable states, which complicates invasive evaluation and can specifically be associated with an increased risk for vascular access complications. Furthermore, anticancer therapies cause injury to the vascular endothelium as well as the myocardium. Meanwhile, improvements in diagnosis and treatment of various cancers have contributed to an increase in overall survival rates in cancer patients. Proper management of this patient population is unclear, as cancer patients are largely excluded from randomized clinical trials on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and national PCI registries. In this review, we will discuss the role of different safety measures that can be applied prior to and during these invasive cardiovascular procedures as well as the role of intravascular imaging techniques in managing these high risk patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
| Scientists | 8 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 19% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,058,932
of 23,666,535 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#226
of 7,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,810
of 329,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,529 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.