↓ Skip to main content

Expanding TAVI to Low and Intermediate Risk Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expanding TAVI to Low and Intermediate Risk Patients
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Voigtländer, Moritz Seiffert

Abstract

TAVI has become the standard treatment in patients at increased surgical risk and is increasingly being performed in patients at intermediate to low surgical risk. While non-inferiority has been demonstrated in intermediate risk patients, several challenges-particularly with regard to valve durability-need to be addressed before expansion to lower risk and younger patients can be recommended on a broad basis. Current trends, trials results, and remaining challenges are summarized and discussed in the light of updated treatment guidelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 47%
Engineering 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,349,015
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,065
of 7,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,891
of 328,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#52
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.