↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Microfluidics Thrombus Formation in Multiple Genetically Modified Mice: Link to Thrombosis and Hemostasis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Analysis of Microfluidics Thrombus Formation in Multiple Genetically Modified Mice: Link to Thrombosis and Hemostasis
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdolna Nagy, Johanna P. van Geffen, David Stegner, David J. Adams, Attila Braun, Susanne M. de Witt, Margitta Elvers, Mitchell J. Geer, Marijke J. E. Kuijpers, Karl Kunzelmann, Jun Mori, Cécile Oury, Joachim Pircher, Irina Pleines, Alastair W. Poole, Yotis A. Senis, Remco Verdoold, Christian Weber, Bernhard Nieswandt, Johan W. M. Heemskerk, Constance C. F. M. J. Baaten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,079,935
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,134
of 7,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,981
of 346,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#17
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.