You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Systematic Review of 4D-Flow MRI Derived Mitral Regurgitation Quantification Methods
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00103 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benjamin Fidock, Natasha Barker, Nithin Balasubramanian, Gareth Archer, Graham Fent, Abdullah Al-Mohammad, James Richardson, Laurence O'Toole, Norman Briffa, Alexander Rothman, Rob van der Geest, Rod Hose, James M. Wild, Andrew J. Swift, Pankaj Garg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 50% |
Switzerland | 2 | 14% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 33% |
Engineering | 14 | 15% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 32 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,808,727
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#500
of 7,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,377
of 346,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#10
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.