↓ Skip to main content

Geriatric Conditions and Prescription of Vitamin K Antagonists vs. Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: SAGE-AF

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geriatric Conditions and Prescription of Vitamin K Antagonists vs. Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: SAGE-AF
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00155
Pubmed ID
Authors

David D. McManus, Catarina Kiefe, Darleen Lessard, Molly E. Waring, David Parish, Hamza H. Awad, Francesca Marino, Robert Helm, Felix Sogade, Robert Goldberg, Robert Hayward, Jerry Gurwitz, Weijia Wang, Tanya Mailhot, Bruce Barton, Jane Saczynski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 23 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 25 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,034,866
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,896
of 7,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,647
of 362,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#33
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,078 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.