You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of MRI and VQ-SPECT as a Screening Test for Patients With Suspected CTEPH: CHANGE-MRI Study Design and Rationale
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00051 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Florian Lasch, Annika Karch, Armin Koch, Thorsten Derlin, Andreas Voskrebenzev, Tawfik Moher Alsady, Marius M. Hoeper, Henning Gall, Fritz Roller, Sebastian Harth, Dagmar Steiner, Gabriele Krombach, Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani, Fabian Rengier, Claus Peter Heußel, Ekkehard Grünig, Dietrich Beitzke, Marcus Hacker, Irene M. Lang, Jürgen Behr, Peter Bartenstein, Julien Dinkel, Kai-Helge Schmidt, Karl-Friedrich Kreitner, Thomas Frauenfelder, Silvia Ulrich, Okka W. Hamer, Michael Pfeifer, Christopher S. Johns, David G. Kiely, Andrew James Swift, Jim Wild, Jens Vogel-Claussen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 30% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,160,034
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,222
of 7,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,210
of 374,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#38
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.