↓ Skip to main content

Umbilical Cord Pericytes Provide a Viable Alternative to Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Neonatal Vascular Engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Umbilical Cord Pericytes Provide a Viable Alternative to Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Neonatal Vascular Engineering
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2020.609980
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Cathery, Ashton Faulkner, Eva Jover, Iker Rodriguez-Arabaolaza, Anita C. Thomas, Elisa Avolio, Massimo Caputo, Paolo Madeddu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Unspecified 3 11%
Professor 1 4%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Unspecified 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Engineering 3 11%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#14,535,525
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,929
of 7,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,731
of 503,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#85
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.