↓ Skip to main content

Rational and Design of the SIMULATOR Study: A Multicentre Randomized Study to Assess the Impact of SIMULation-bAsed Training on Transoesophageal echocardiOgraphy leaRning for Cardiology Residents

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 8,992)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
57 news outlets
twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rational and Design of the SIMULATOR Study: A Multicentre Randomized Study to Assess the Impact of SIMULation-bAsed Training on Transoesophageal echocardiOgraphy leaRning for Cardiology Residents
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, May 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2021.661355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Théo Pezel, Anne Bernard, Yoan Lavie Badie, Julien Dreyfus, Etienne Audureau, Yohann Bohbot, Damien Fard, Arnaud Hubert, Lee S. Nguyen, Cécile Monteil, Loïc Bière, Florent Le Ven, Marjorie Canu, Sophie Ribeyrolles, Baptiste Mion, Basile Mouhat, Baptiste Bazire, Charles Fauvel, Julien Ternacle, Jennifer Cautela, Théo Cambet, Thierry Le Tourneau, Erwan Donal, Stéphane Lafitte, Nicolas Mansencal, Augustin Coisne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Design 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 424. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#66,744
of 25,145,981 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#9
of 8,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,069
of 440,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,145,981 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,992 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.