↓ Skip to main content

Absence of Obesity Paradox in All-Cause Mortality Among Chinese Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Absence of Obesity Paradox in All-Cause Mortality Among Chinese Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Multicenter Cohort Study
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2021.730368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bin Zhou, Xuerong Sun, Na Yu, Shuang Zhao, Keping Chen, Wei Hua, Yangang Su, Jiefu Yang, Zhaoguang Liang, Wei Xu, Min Tang, Shu Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,140
of 6,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,777
of 498,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#349
of 761 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,648 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 761 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.