You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Quantitative Aortographic Assessment of Regurgitation in Patients Treated With VitaFlow Transcatheter Heart Valve vs. Other Self-Expanding Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2021.747174 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rutao Wang, Hideyuki Kawashima, Chao Gao, Fangjun Mou, Ping Li, Junjie Zhang, Jian Yang, Jianfang Luo, Darren Mylotte, William Wijns, Yoshinobu Onuma, Osama Soliman, Ling Tao, Patrick W. Serruys |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#20,440,241
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,297
of 6,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#412,872
of 502,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#518
of 840 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,898 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 840 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.