↓ Skip to main content

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors vs. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP4) Inhibitors for New-Onset Dementia: A Propensity Score-Matched Population-Based Study With Competing Risk Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors vs. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP4) Inhibitors for New-Onset Dementia: A Propensity Score-Matched Population-Based Study With Competing Risk Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2021.747620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan V. Mui, Jiandong Zhou, Sharen Lee, Keith Sai Kit Leung, Teddy Tai Loy Lee, Oscar Hou In Chou, Shek Long Tsang, Abraham Ka Chung Wai, Tong Liu, Tak Wong, Carlin Chang, Gary Tse, Qingpeng Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Unknown 19 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 21 78%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,555,549
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,242
of 7,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,043
of 439,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#138
of 733 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 733 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.