↓ Skip to main content

Global burden of calcific aortic valve disease and attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global burden of calcific aortic valve disease and attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2019
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1003233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiaye Yu, Zhuo Wang, Qinyi Bao, Shuxin Lei, Yayu You, Zhehui Yin, Xiaojie Xie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#18,716,137
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,327
of 7,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,291
of 440,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#323
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.