↓ Skip to main content

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device treatment for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy complicated by advanced biventricular failure – University of Tokyo experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device treatment for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy complicated by advanced biventricular failure – University of Tokyo experiences
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1023191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minoru Ono

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#19,378,105
of 24,679,965 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,493
of 8,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,490
of 432,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#371
of 1,041 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,679,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,602 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,041 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.