You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Different Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Catheter-Related Thrombosis of the Upper Extremities in Women With Gynecologic and Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.880698 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angelo Porfidia, Giulia Cammà, Nicola Coletta, Margherita Bigossi, Igor Giarretta, Andrea Lupascu, Giuseppe Scaletta, Enrica Porceddu, Paolo Tondi, Giovanni Scambia, Gabriella Ferrandina, Roberto Pola |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,463,735
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,585
of 6,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,536
of 437,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#208
of 970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,751 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.