You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sensitivity and specificity of automated blood pressure devices to detect atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.956542 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edmond W. L. Tang, Benjamin H. K. Yip, Chun-Pong Yu, Samuel Y. S. Wong, Eric K. P. Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 2 | 40% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 33% |
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#13,113,968
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,409
of 7,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,559
of 432,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#166
of 999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.