You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of three thromboprophylaxis regimens in critically ill COVID-19 patients: An analysis of real-world data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.978420 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed Alrashed, Peter Cahusac, Yahya A Mohzari, Reem F Bamogaddam, Mashael Alfaifi, Maya Mathew, Bashayer F Alrumayyan, Basmah F Alqahtani, Amjad Alshammari, Kholud AlNekhilan, Aljawharah Binrokan, Khalil Alamri, Abdullah Alshahrani, Safar Alshahrani, Ahmad S Alanazi, Batool M Alhassan, Ali Alsaeed, Wedad Almutairi, Asma Albujaidy, Lama AlJuaid, Ziyad S Almalki, Nehad Ahmed, Hamdan N Alajami, Hala M Aljishi, Mohammed Alsheef, Saleh A Alajlan, Faisal Almutairi, Atheer Alsirhani, Manayer Alotaibi, Melaf A Aljaber, Hammam A Bahammam, Hussain Aldandan, Abdulaziz S Almulhim, Ivo Abraham, Ahmad Alamer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#13,965,495
of 24,914,266 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,592
of 8,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,231
of 394,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#163
of 1,020 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,914,266 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,810 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,020 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.