↓ Skip to main content

Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and effectiveness of post percutaneous coronary intervention physiological assessment: Retrospective data from the post-revascularization optimization and physiological evaluation of intermediate lesions using fractional flow reserve registry
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2022.983003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Maria Leone, Stefano Migliaro, Giuseppe Zimbardo, Pio Cialdella, Eloisa Basile, Domenico Galante, Federico Di Giusto, Gianluca Anastasia, Andrea Vicere, Edoardo Petrolati, Antonio Di Stefano, Giorgia Campaniello, Domenico D’Amario, Rocco Vergallo, Rocco Antonio Montone, Antonino Buffon, Enrico Romagnoli, Cristina Aurigemma, Francesco Burzotta, Carlo Trani, Filippo Crea

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,135,502
of 26,134,677 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#268
of 9,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,900
of 436,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#29
of 1,020 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,134,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,442 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,020 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.