↓ Skip to main content

The haemostatic arsenal of the pediatric cardiac surgeon

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The haemostatic arsenal of the pediatric cardiac surgeon
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1210564
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Reynolds, William Novick, Oleksandr Yachhnik, Andriy Plylypets, Massimo Griselli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#15,548,023
of 24,641,620 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,264
of 8,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,921
of 195,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#42
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,572 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.