↓ Skip to main content

Clinical outcomes of takotsubo syndrome in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical outcomes of takotsubo syndrome in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, September 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1244808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takumi Osawa, Kazuko Tajiri, Masaki Ieda, Tomoko Ishizu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#19,259,556
of 24,525,534 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,449
of 8,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,388
of 167,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#70
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,478 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.