↓ Skip to main content

Remotely detuned receiver coil for high-resolution interventional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Remotely detuned receiver coil for high-resolution interventional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1249572
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sina Marhabaie, Marylène Delcey, Dounia El Hamrani, Fanny Vaillant, Jean-Christophe Ginefri, Valéry Ozenne, Emma Abell, Marie Poirier-Quinot, Bruno Quesson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#22,148,419
of 24,713,766 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#5,288
of 8,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,051
of 166,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#179
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,713,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.