↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Insights in general cardiovascular medicine: 2022

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Insights in general cardiovascular medicine: 2022
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1259212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurizio Acampa, Riccardo Accioli, Viola Salvini, Junjie Xiao, Pietro Enea Lazzerini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#15,352,116
of 24,337,175 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,180
of 8,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,775
of 228,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#46
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,337,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.