↓ Skip to main content

Invasive imaging modalities in a spontaneous coronary artery dissection: when “believing is seeing”

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Invasive imaging modalities in a spontaneous coronary artery dissection: when “believing is seeing”
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1270259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zlatko Mehmedbegović, Igor Ivanov, Milenko Čanković, Zoran Perišić, Tomislav Kostić, Bojan Maričić, Gordana Krljanac, Branko Beleslin, Svetlana Apostolović

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,218,781
of 24,673,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,579
of 8,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,950
of 177,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#52
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,673,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,591 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.