↓ Skip to main content

A diabetic patient increased premature ventricular contractions after using liraglutide: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A diabetic patient increased premature ventricular contractions after using liraglutide: a case report
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1332754
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilan Huang, He Yu, Ying Fang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,571,735
of 25,278,281 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,376
of 9,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,365
of 155,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#52
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,278,281 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.