↓ Skip to main content

Intra-cardiac motion detection catheter for the early identification of acute pericardial tamponade during invasive cardiac procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intra-cardiac motion detection catheter for the early identification of acute pericardial tamponade during invasive cardiac procedures
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1341202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dinesh Selvakumar, Michael A. Barry, Jim Pouliopoulos, Juntang Lu, Vu Tran, Pramesh Kovoor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#14,456,548
of 25,253,876 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,738
of 9,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,683
of 226,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#24
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,253,876 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,086 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.