↓ Skip to main content

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease landscape in Singapore

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease landscape in Singapore
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1342698
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ching-Hui Sia, Oliver Simon, Poay-Huan Loh, Kian Keong Poh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#16,411,586
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,514
of 9,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,188
of 223,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#22
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,409 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.