You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implantable cardiac monitors: artificial intelligence and signal processing reduce remote ECG review workload and preserve arrhythmia detection sensitivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1343424 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Bisignani, Jim W. Cheung, Roberto Rordorf, Valentina Kutyifa, Daniel Hofer, Dana Berti, Luigi Di Biase, Eimo Martens, Vincenzo Russo, Paolo Vitillo, Marlies Zoutendijk, Thomas Deneke, Irina Köhler, Jürgen Schrader, Gaurav Upadhyay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 22% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,191,109
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#278
of 9,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,640
of 353,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#6
of 420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.