↓ Skip to main content

The effect of surgery started at different time point during the day on the clinical outcomes of mitral valve surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of surgery started at different time point during the day on the clinical outcomes of mitral valve surgery
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1360763
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuai Zheng, Jiangang Wang, Haibo Zhang, Shengyu Wang, Xu Meng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#19,948,019
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,720
of 9,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,342
of 152,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#50
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.