↓ Skip to main content

Divergent electrophysiologic action of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin on ventricular and atrial tachyarrhythmias in isolated rabbit hearts

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Divergent electrophysiologic action of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin on ventricular and atrial tachyarrhythmias in isolated rabbit hearts
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1369250
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian Wolfes, Jan Uphoff, Sven Kemena, Felix Wegner, Benjamin Rath, Lars Eckardt, Gerrit Frommeyer, Christian Ellermann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,747,159
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#5,819
of 9,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,632
of 154,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#174
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,213 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.