↓ Skip to main content

Study on the optimal elastic modulus of flexible blades for right heart assist device supporting patients with single-ventricle physiologies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study on the optimal elastic modulus of flexible blades for right heart assist device supporting patients with single-ventricle physiologies
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1377765
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tong Chen, Xiaoming Cheng, Xudong Liu, Huifeng Zhang, Shengzhang Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,806,838
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,476
of 9,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,309
of 152,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#57
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.