You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Divergent cardiac and renal effects of miR-181c-5p inhibition in a rodent heart failure model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1383046 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jente R. A. Boen, Andreas B. Gevaert, Amélie Dendooven, Dustin Krüger, Michiel Tubeeckx, Jens Van Fraeyenhove, Tine Bruyns, Vincent F. M. Segers, Emeline M. Van Craenenbroeck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Belgium | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,489,675
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,105
of 9,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,706
of 263,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#23
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.