↓ Skip to main content

An explainable machine learning approach using contemporary UNOS data to identify patients who fail to bridge to heart transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An explainable machine learning approach using contemporary UNOS data to identify patients who fail to bridge to heart transplantation
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1383800
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mamoun T. Mardini, Chen Bai, Maisara Bledsoe, Benjamin Shickel, Mohammad A. Al-Ani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,741,039
of 26,007,325 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,485
of 9,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,482
of 176,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,007,325 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.