You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Makes for a Successful Digital Health Integrated Program of Work? Lessons Learnt and Recommendations From the Melbourne Children's Campus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Digital Health, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fdgth.2021.661708 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danah Hourani, Simone Darling, Eloise Cameron, James Dromey, Louise Crossley, Sanji Kanagalingam, Frank Muscara, Amanda Gwee, Grace Gell, Harriet Hiscock, Vicki Anderson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#13,392,150
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Health
#318
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,243
of 447,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Health
#24
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.