You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is the Automation of Digital Mental Health Ethical? Applying an Ethical Framework to Chatbots for Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Digital Health, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fdgth.2021.689736 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanna Nunes Vilaza, Darragh McCashin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 20% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,456,219
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Health
#151
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,620
of 428,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Health
#22
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.